Bridgeville Trying To Block Upper St. Clair Neighborhood Entrance

The borough hopes closing Main Street will block the Bedner neighborhood’s plans for an entrance.

When is a street not a street?

Bridgeville is trying to remove from the borough’s street plans in order to block the Bedner’s developer from building an entrance in that area.

The voted unanimously after a 40-minute public hearing on the issue to grant a neighbor’s petition to close the small patch of grass near a farm gate to traffic. It’s too early to tell if the decision will scuttle plans by the Bedner’s developers to build an entrance there, or if it merely will be a nuisance for the residential plan.

“I know this isn’t the solution to the problem,” said Neil Lyons, the neighbor who petitioned the borough. “But it’s something that I have the ability to do to prevent this.”

He added that he’s worried that will “walk all over us” after that township’s on April 2. The development was approved with entrances at Main Street, Cook School Road and Scarlett Drive.

Meanwhile, at least 20 Bridgeville residents attended the public hearing to discuss how to remove traffic from the roads that will be most impacted by the influx of cars. A traffic study commissioned by the borough could come back with suggestions that include one-way streets, speed ramps, more signs and lowered speed limits.

“Speed is going to get someone killed on that road,” said borough resident Michael Regan, who lives on Ridge Road.

He hoped the study would show traffic calming devices such as speed ramps could slow traffic in that area. Any suggestions in the traffic study would have to be approved by 70 percent of residents living on Ridge Road, Main Street, Cook School Road and Pesavento Drive.

“Anything you can do to speed that process up, I would strongly appreciate that,” he said.

Bob Fryer, who is co-owner of the on Route 50, said “the ballgame has changed” with the new development and hoped the borough would try to request more state funding to improve the roads in the area.

“We’re taking the abuse from all the neighboring communities and I think we should be able to ask for any money available,” Fryer said.

But other projects, such as plans to renovate a crumbling wall on Bower Hill Road, have been rejected for funding. Council President Nino Petrocelli Sr. said “there’s not money,” although borough lawyer Richard Ferris said they’re working hard to find any available funds.

“Everyone is working,” Ferris said. “We’re trying to explore every avenue.”

What do you think about the Bridgeville Council's action? Tell us in the comments.

You can also take our poll, do you think the commissioners should have approved the Bedner's Farm development plan? to cast your vote.

This article first appeared on Chartiers Valley Patch.

Tax Payer April 11, 2012 at 12:04 PM
I generally don't support government handouts but isn't it ridiculous that that there is that massive (eyesore), nearly empty parking structure at South Hills Village and yet Bridgeville can't get help repairing a crumbling wall in a heavy traffic area?
Tax Payer II April 11, 2012 at 03:11 PM
I agree that money is given to the entities with the most political pull. unfortunately the community of Bridgeville is a high traffic area and many infrastructure updates are needed. it is a shame that the Borough could not require updates be made buy the contractor building the homes. The lost of this green space with paving over a large percentage of the space will also provide a lot of additional run off water during the heavy down pours of rain in the warm weather. Are the creeks able to handle this additional run off without overflowing the banks? I already see Painters run looking like ragging rapids during heavy rain storms. where is the additional water going?
william atwell May 03, 2012 at 07:06 PM
What is sad is I am sure the developer would of made a very nice road for bridgeville. But I guess a lot of residence there think like USC residents. We want it but not in our backyard. Moving here from west Virginia 10 years ago, all I can say is this area is spoiled and self centered. Instead of allowing something in that could help one town fix a road they say no. In USC instead of allowing consol to be used to bring in a bigger tax base we have people who say no. All I can say as a tax payer I'm sick of high taxes because people can not look at the big picture!
Mike May 04, 2012 at 12:56 PM
Do you believe taxes will be lowered as a result of any of this development? It is not a function of no development, but smart development. It is a function of making sure traffic is controlled. In this case a nice road won't do anything due to the gridlock that will follow. Look at the township website which describes USC as a "primarily residential community." It has been this way since you moved here and if that is not the type of community you were seeking, then you should have chosen a different location. There is nothing wrong with development. There is something wrong with changing the character and nature of our town.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something