.
Feedback

Peters Police Refile Charges Against USC Police Chief's Son

John Pardini was first charged last year for riding a bicycle on Route 19 while under the influence, among other charges.

refiled charges against a son of the chief on Monday.

John Anthony Pardini, 44, 2632 Monterey Dr., Upper St. Clair, was arrested in August 2011 when an officer spotted him riding a bike in circles on Washington Road just before 11:30 p.m.

The officer stated in a criminal complaint filed with  that there were no lights on the bicycle and that it appeared the rider was having a hard time keeping balance.

The officer stated Pardini was carrying a cold, six-pack of beer while riding the bike and that two bottles were missing.

After Pardini failed field sobriety tests, the officer told him he was going to be arrested for DUI. 

Pardini yelled an obscenity, tried to run across Washington Road and that's when the officer deployed a taser to bring Pardini to a halt in the center turn lane, according to the complaint.

The officer stated a second taser discharge was required during handcuffing.

During the arrest the officer stated that a small amount of marijuana and a metal pipe fell from Pardini's pocket.

Pardini's blood alcohol content was at .097 percent. The legal level of alcohol in Pennsylvania is .08 percent.

Pardini is charged with resisting arrest, driving under the influence of alcohol or controlled substance, public drunkenness, possession of small amount of marijuana, possession of drug paraphernalia and not having a front lamp on his bicycle. 

According to the Washington Observer-Reporter, the charges were initially dismissed after a preliminary hearing last October before .

Roger June 14, 2012 at 10:39 am
I'm confused. The story says the charges were dismissed last October, but the story does not say why. This story says the charges are refiled. The same charges? Or different charges? "refile" would imply the charges are the same. If the same, why would the result be any different? Why the time lapse between October 2011, and June 2012? Has something new been brought to the case?
Is something is missing in this story, or have I missed something significant?
Anonymous June 14, 2012 at 03:13 pm
Busting crime Peters style.... One bicycle at a time. What a waste of time, money and resources. Some guys like playing baseball and football, others like playing in the road. Whatever floats your boat.
Amanda Gillooly (Editor) June 14, 2012 at 07:01 pm
Jill - I'm Amanda Gillooly - one of Becky Brindle's fellow Patch.com editors. I just wanted to let you know I deleted your comment because it contained a personal attack—which violates our terms of service. If you'd like to rephrase and repost, please do!
Amanda Gillooly (Editor) June 14, 2012 at 07:24 pm
@Roger: We are working on a follow up. In the meantime, I wanted to post some source documentation that might be useful to you. Here is a link to the docket with the most recent charges (filed 6/11) : http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/MDJReport.aspx?district=MDJ-27-3-06&docketNumber=MJ-27306-CR-0000157-2012
Here is the docket information for the earlier incident: http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/DocketSheets/MDJReport.aspx?district=MDJ-27-3-01&docketNumber=MJ-27301-CR-0000185-2011 Thanks as always for posting Roger! If I can be of any further help, just give a holler!
Roger June 15, 2012 at 01:23 am
Amanda, thanks much for those links. I have no experience in reading this material, but the only difference (save the dates) is the judge to whom the case is directed. I find it interesting that the "dismissed" is done without cause.
Maybe somebody very familiar with court proceedings can check in and give us an explanation. Please, skip the "it could be," or "it might be." I'm looking for somebody who understands the procedures, not conjecture. I have no dog in this fight. I care not about how many cans of beer were unopened, how much marijuana was in his possession, or whether the light on his bicycle was working. However, I am interested in how the courts work, and how judicial proceedings are prosecuted. I appreciate getting the links to the dockets. I don't have any idea how that material is distributed, and made available, so the links are helpful.
Amanda Gillooly (Editor) June 15, 2012 at 02:34 am
Anything I can do to help, Roger. We are working on a follow and will try to get your questions answered as soon as we can get the info! If you need anything else, just drop me a comment or an email (amanda.gillooly@patch.com).
Rand June 15, 2012 at 08:56 am
Roger if a charge is dismissed "without prejudice" in a preliminary hearing then prosecutors are allowed to refile charges. If it is dismissed "with prejudice" then they are not. This case was likely dismissed without prejudice because the judge felt that the prosecution was missing some evidence at the time of the preliminary hearing needed for the charges to be held over for trial or the prosecution didn't follow the proper procedure. As for the court dockets you looked at -- those are used for court administration more than anything else and only give a summary of the case. For a more in depth look you'd have to get the criminal complaint and related court motions which are available at the magistrates office.
Roger June 15, 2012 at 10:26 am
Rand, thanks for the insight. Perhaps more information will be available when the case is heard.
Lynn Bullions June 15, 2012 at 08:51 pm
I tgake issue with the headline of this article. The man charged is 44 years old, an adult. I do not think that the most important fact was that he was the police chief's son. The chief is no longer responsible for his son's actions, so why bring him into this?
Lynne June 16, 2012 at 01:41 am
An adult, who still lives with his daddy....
william atwell June 16, 2012 at 01:53 pm
It does not matter if he lives with daddy. Per the law once a person reaches the age of 18 they are adults and held response able for there own actions. What is a shame since I have moved to USC is the name dropping. What I'd even a bigger shame is the police chief is a very honorable person and this is a shame that the police chief name is being brought up because something his 44 year old son has done. Who Cares if he is the police chief son or the presidents son. He is 44 and his own person.
Rob Jones June 19, 2012 at 12:45 am
Mr. Atwell, that may be the only thing you've ever said on here that I actually agree with. Couldn't have said it better myself.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Upper St. Clair Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
TXPirate June 19, 2013 at 10:32 am
The Bible makes it very clear what Christ's expectations are for Christians surrounding gambling andRead More games of chance. Bingo and a Raffle should strike many as surprising events/activities for a church sponsored event. The 'MoreFest' is a wonderful event to provide a family friendly Christian atmosphere for the community. Sadly, the activities themselves send a mixed message, further confusing non-believers who prefer to frame Christians as hypocrites rather than fallible humans who are saved because the choose to believe.
david m. weintraub June 6, 2013 at 11:22 am
no supper JUST GREAT DEALS.
david m. weintraub June 6, 2013 at 11:25 am
USC FARMERS MARKET EVERY THUR.
david m. weintraub June 7, 2013 at 08:50 am
WE WILL HAVE GREAT ITEMS @USC LIONS CLUB SUPER GARAGE SALE.