Why Did You Vote Tuesday? Or Why Didn't You?
Tell us why you voted—or chose not to—in the primary election that included candidates for U.S. president and legislators, and key state offices.
What was it that kept voters from the polls Tuesday?
The number of registered voters who came out to cast their ballots yesterday hovered at around 20 percent for both Allegheny and Washington counties.
The dry and typically spring weather can't be blamed for the light voter turnout.
So was it apathy? Being disenfranchised with the slate of candidates? Convinced it wasn't worth effort since Romney and Obama were 'going to win' the party nomination anyhow? Not worried about federal and state legislative offices? Unhappy with the tone of politics?
In Allegheny County, which has 888,686 registered voters, a mere 19.34 percent turned out to cast their ballots, according to the county's Division of Elections website. Of those 171,916 voters, 37.26 percent were Republicans, 62.69 were Democrats and .05 percent were nonpartisan voters.
But a higher percentage of registered Republicans turned out to vote compared to registered Democrats. According to unofficial results, 26.37 percent of registered Republicans voted, but only 19.9 percent of Democrats cast their ballots Tuesday.
In 2008, when the last presidential primary was held, voter turnout was 41.51 percent, more than double the percentage voting Tuesday.
Results for Washington County were similar. Only 20.72 percent of the 139,738 registered voters went to the polls yesterday—a mere 28,959 residents, according to the county election office staff.
But the office's website archives show in the last presidential primary, 56,389 of 134,152 registered voters turned out, roughly double the number at 42.03 percent.
Did you vote yesterday? Tell us why you went to the polls in the comments section below.
If you didn't vote, tell us that, too. We're interested in finding out your reasons. And do you plan to vote in November?
Carolyn Gabriel
11:50 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
It's always been my understanding that Independents cannot vote in the primaries. If that's incorrect, however, I would LOVE to know.
Robert Edward Healy, III
11:54 am on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Carolyn, Independents are not allowed to vote in primary races, but there are often other items on the ballot during primary Election Day that they are allowed to vote on. For instance, the PA House's 22nd District yesterday was up for a special election. Independents could have voted in that race.
John Spoon
12:05 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
When I looked at the ballot it seemed almost pointless since everyone was pretty much unopposed except for a few races. In those I picked whomever had the least annoying ads.
Mike
10:45 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
Voting is never pointless. Ever.
Amanda Gillooly
12:07 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
John, I know that many of my friends were sick of the negative ads—so I understand what you mean.
Gabrielle Michalek
12:29 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I voted because it is my right as a citizen and to honor the memory of those who have sacrificed so much that I might have that right.
Heidi Dezayas
12:33 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Nicely said!
Robert Edward Healy, III
1:33 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Hear hear.
MSgt. John DeLallo
12:31 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
Well said. I cannot fathom how folks can view an ocean of miniature American flags flying over gravesites on Memorial Day, get choked up, but on election day, they sit home on their arses. As one pundit quipped, two fellows were talking about our voter turnout. One said he thought that ignorance and apathy had finally overtaken the American spirit. The other replied he didn't know about that, and actually didn't care. It was meant as a joke, but its simply not funny. I vote for my 5 grandkids, for they will inherit the good, or bad, judgement shown by the "class of 2012" in Harrisburg and in Washington, D.C.
Amanda Gillooly
1:43 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Indeed!
Julie Salomon
1:56 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I voted because it is my civic duty, but I have to say that I am rather tired of PA not mattering when it comes to the Presidential elections. By the time it gets to our state we are irrelevant in how we vote. I wish that wasn't the cast and that there was a primary that took place at the same time all over the country.
Margaret French
8:27 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Amen!
Zandy Dudiak
2:04 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I agree Julie. One primary date across the country might be more fair to the candidates and electorate.
Paula Lim
8:25 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Agree!!!
John G Yakim, candidate for State Representative
10:51 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
A single primary date would mean only candidates with a ton of money would be able to afford to run for President. As much as I know you do not like Rick Santorum, he was able to be competitive with a very small amount of money because the initial states are small and rely on grassroots campaigning. One National primary date would mean he would not have been able to afford to be competitive. If you remember, in the last Presidential election, a guy no one had heard of was able to be competitive in the early primaries. I think he did pretty good after that, if my memory is correct.
John McChesney
2:41 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Not voting is inexcusable. There is more going on than selecting a predetermined presidential candidate.
John McChesney
Mike Jones
3:32 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
What's inexcusable is Pennsylvania's rigged primary system that doesn't allow independents to vote. We might not have as many problems at the state and federal levels if everyone was allowed to participate.
Mike
10:49 am on Friday, April 27, 2012
Independents choose to not be a member of a political party. So why would they vote on who would lead a party?
It'd be like voting to elect a leader of a club that you don't belong to.
If you want to vote in a primary then join a political party.
Mike Jones
3:30 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
I always thought the point of voting was to select someone to lead a city, state or country. Thanks for clarifying that for me.
Mike
8:01 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Mike - That's what voting in the general election is. A primary election is partially used to determine who will lead your chosen party.
Mike Jones
1:58 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Mike... So the solution is multiple parties (I'm talking six or seven). Three parties ain't gonna cut it because independents have a wide range of beliefs and values.
Do you think the entrenched players from the two parties would ever let that happen?
Ed M
2:54 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I haven't missed an election since I have been old enough to vote. Voted yesterday.
Erin Faulk
6:46 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Agreed, Mike! I have always thought registered independents should have an opportunity to vote in primary elections.
Miguelito
7:28 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
if so-called "Independents" want to vote in Democrat or Republican primaries, they should register as Democrats or Republicans. Party primaries are party business. By registering as Independents, you are saying you don't care about Democrat or Republican party business. Of course Independents can alway run their own slate of candidates, but that would require taking a postion and responsiblity, which Independent seek to avoid. There is nothing "rigged," about Pennsylvania primaries. Sign up or shut up. You
Mike Jones
7:58 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
By signing up as an independent, you're saying you don't worship at the altar of party politics. You can hold strong beliefs without being one or the other. The current primary system has radicalized our government because, for the most part, moderates can't make it to the general election.
Erin Faulk
8:34 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Hi Miguelito,
Thanks for sharing your opinion. As a registered independent myself, I hear your argument all the time.
Here's my take on it: As an independent, I am saying that I choose to look equally at what's happening in each party, and choose the best candidate based not on party affiliation, but on the qualities, qualifications and actions of the candidate. In the primary election, Democrats choose the Democrat they want to support, Republicans choose the Republican they want to support. I, as an independent voter, would like the opportunity to choose who I feel is the best candidate as well.
Of course, I chose to register as an independent voter knowing that I wouldn't be able to vote in primary elections. That's the way our system works right now, and although I hope it changes in the future, I accept it the way it is. I knew what I was doing when I registered.
You see, it's not that independents don't care—it's that we happened to sign up with a set of beliefs that not everyone shares. And I'm totally fine with that. I can assure you, this "so called independent" will be one of the first at the polls in November, ready to cast an informed vote.
Be
6:35 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
running an independent slate would require doing a handstand inward 4 1/2 in the pike position off the springboard. "party business" doesnt make that possible.
Frank
8:54 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
Very well said Erin. I am also a fellow independent and agree with everything you said. I think it's like 14 states or so that does not allow independents to vote in primaries (except for special elections). I hope to see that change also, but at the same time I knew that when I switched from democrat to independent.
Roger
9:40 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I voted because it is my civic duty. I take interest in our government because it has much influence on how our society works and directs the paths of our culture. I see today's report that only about 20% of the registered voters did vote on Tuesday. I don't know what percent of the population is registered to vote. The bottom line is that few are making decisions for the masses. There seems to be no shortage of those offering complaints. But, are those the ones who show up at the polls? I'm doubting so.
On the national level, a very small percentage of people will be making the big decision for President. What can we expect for voter turnout in November, 35%, 40%. But, there is only a narrow slice of voters who are the target of the campaign. I suspect that many (80%?) of those going to the polls in November already know their vote. The undecided, say 20% of the 40%, are the only ones the Presidential campaign is attempting to influence.
Somebody else, more skilled with processing these data, can help us out on the suggested "undecided" vote. Are my estimates pretty good, way off, or irrelevant? What will each of those votes be costing the campaigns?
Paula Lim
8:29 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I am in 100% agreement with Roger. No vote....no complaints. I love the idea of being so principled that you register as an Independent, But until thongs have changes, just pick a party, register, then vote your conscience.....
Mike Jones
8:36 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Roger... I would put that number of undecideds even lower. It seems like our political opinions are so polarized right now that I wouldn't be surprised if less than 10 percent of voters are still pondering their choice for president. That's a razor-thin slice of the American population.
JustMe
12:38 pm on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
ML, she probably did a typo and meant to type things.
Jon Wain
10:01 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
i love the indepentent " i go with the more popular folks". its reps or dems folks one or another, not who's popular or the talk show favorites.stay home and let the smart folks vote
Be
6:42 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
yes. stay home independents. let the smart folks on the government teet vote. i agree with jon wain. its one or the other.
Scott Beveridge
10:08 pm on Wednesday, April 25, 2012
I always vote because I lived during the 1960s when men were sent to Vietnam to die for their country at age 18, but were not allowed to vote at that age for the president who put them in harm's way. It was be a big victory for voter rights when the law was changed. That said, this primary was boring.
Patricia K Arndt
8:18 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Pennsylvania election laws are rigged in favor of the Democratic and Republican parties. Third party candidates must obtain more than 3 times as many signatures on petitions for state-wide positions as Democratic or Republican candidates. Independents have no voice at all. It is time to have open primaries in Pennsylvania.
Nettie Jane
8:35 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I voted because my sisters went to prison, were force fed, and died for my right to do so. Onward and forward Mr. President I am on your team!!
*JB*
2:53 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Maybe Mr. President's slogan should be "Backward". That is certainly the direction he and his administration have taken our country. Hopefully we will be able to vote in a candidate and an administration with a pro-business agenda and put a stop to the endless regulations imposed on business which affects all of us. Looks like it's time to pull the "R" lever at the polls and create massive job opportunities again. So long Mr. President......
Zandy Dudiak
9:13 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I, too, am an independent. According to Gallop.com, "the percentage of Americans identifying as political independents increased in 2011, as is common in a non-election year, although the 40% who did so is the highest Gallup has measured, by one percentage point. More Americans continue to identify as Democrats than as Republicans, 31% to 27%. That shows a growing dissatisfaction with the two-party system." As long as the two major parties remain viewed as conservative and liberal, I think people with more moderate viewpoints will continue to leave. We, as a nation, have lost the ability to compromise. And that scares me.
Mike Jones
12:45 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Well said, Zandy... I couldn't agree more.
Erin Faulk
3:20 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
Agreed. Well said.
Mary Matsuura
11:16 am on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I agree with many of the opinions reflected here by the Independents. I'm a registered Democrat but I don't follow the party religiously. I am basically liberal, which to me means I care about our society more than myself. I vote because without my vote I'll have less of a chance to see the changes I believe in. I don't vote to cancel out someone from another party! I vote in hopes of raising that low number of voters turning out, those who are selecting our leaders for the majority. I vote so that this changes and my vote is the least I can do. I also volunteer!!!
Be
8:51 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
I care about society more than myself. Ok. Say you had a choice. Society could be perfect in every way you could possibly imagine. It could be a neo socialist utopia where everyone was the same or whatever the stated liberal agenda is these days. But the price is that you and your whole family and everyone you knew had to be sacrificed to obtain that goal. It can be the way you want, but you can't be a part of it, and the decision would be yours alone to make. Still think you care more about society than yourself? I think not.
Your statement is in direct violation of the law of human nature
Joseph
2:22 pm on Thursday, April 26, 2012
I find it scary that we allow two parties to control OUR country. I take voting very seriously. A vote is support, approval-- delegating authority to act in your best interest.
I only vote for those I fully support, which is usually not many people at all. I've been registered only to participate in the primary election, but this was my last. I'm so fed up with the two-party system.
Could George Washington's words ring more true?
"However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion."
And we allow this to happen out of fear because 'we can't let the other person win.' Forget the cliches, the democracy that has been fought and sacrificed for has been lost. Voting without principle only enables further degradation of the political process.
As John Quincy Adams said, “Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost.”
While some say those that do not vote waste their vote and have no right to complain, I say the contrary and those that do not vote out of principle cherish their vote and have every right to complain.
Roger
9:25 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
This thread has many good comments. Perhaps a basic question needs to have an answer: What is the purpose of primary elections?
A good, solid and well-founded answer may go a long way to help address the concerns about open primaries, independents, etc.
Anybody?
Mike Jones
11:09 pm on Friday, April 27, 2012
I think the best idea would be to have a system that pulls the top three candidates from a preliminary vote in the spring and let the general public vote on those winner. What say you, Roger?
William McCloskey
10:43 am on Saturday, April 28, 2012
... Sometimes you have to hold your nose while you vote, but if you don't vote the entrenched fixers are guaranteed to win
Be
8:30 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Because "representative democracy" is the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on mankind. The ruling class has never changed and never will. Now instead of declaring themselves king by the grace of god or at the point of a sword, you sanction them king with your vote, and that makes you feel as if you matter, when you really dont.. Government is a money making enterprise. Always has been, and always will be, however fair seeming the form it appears to take. The only thing that changes is the faces, so it appears different, but it never changes. Like any going concern, its sole purpose is to perpetuate its continued existence. Same old story with a different cast, so you can feel good about yourself in your mind, So the little people can feel important, like they matter, but in truth you're just tools in a scam that goes back to beginning of man.
Maybe I should move somewhere where despotism can be taken whole, without the base alloy of hipocrisy.
That is why I dont vote, wont vote, because I know i don't matter.I don't need to feel like I matter. If i do, I only sanction a business whose product I do not want to buy. Their power to abuse is given through your sanctioning of that power, your vote is their power. So for all of these whiners and complainers about government abuses, its your fault if you vote.
Alexander M. Cianfracco
9:41 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012
"Be", your hipster logic makes me sick. Instead of actually getting involved and making changes from within the system, it's easier for you to sit and complain about how unfair the system is to you. Living in a society means everything isn't always exactly what you want, so suck it up and stop whining.
Coward.
Be
1:34 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
The system is the problem sir. I dont complain about unfairness ever sir. Thats the realm of your people. The system doesnt affect me one tiny bit. I dont live and die off the government teet, like you and your people do. You have never one time heard me complain about how what government does affects me. I accept the reality of what government is. If it screws me, i live with it, if it helps me, i live with it. But either way, I do not sanction it. The bottom line is you support government that you perceive as helping you, at the expense of others in the society. Government is not designed to do what is best for everyone. It has never been the purpose of it and never will be. You sir are the coward. You use government to get you what you want, at the expense of others. Every person who votes is looking to get something from government. Thats why you see 40% turnout. Because the only people voting are out to get something by the most heinous and cowardly method possible. Using government to get it, which means stealing it from someone else. That is all government does. Takes from one portion of society to give to another portion of society. Liberal, conservative, it matters not. The only that matters is who gets the money.
Be
1:34 pm on Thursday, May 10, 2012
Do the food stamp, union, government employee, entitlement class get the money? Or does the wall street, military industrial complex class get the money. This about 40% of american society. Thus 40%-50% turnout, along with "civic duty" suckers. The only people that vote feel they can get something from government. The only people who "get involved" are getting something, or at least feel they might get something, or feel they might get something taken from them. Government should not be in the business of giving and taking. But, that is exactly what its business is.
Mike
8:03 am on Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Independents crack me up