What Would You Improve in Upper St. Clair in 2013?
If you could make a New Year's resolution for Upper St. Clair, what would it be?
More than 45 percent of Americans make a resolution every year, according to statisticbrain.com. Some people vow to live a healthier lifestyle, others promise to spend more time with family, and many say they will try to save money.
As millions of Americans make resolutions to improve their lives, what could we do right here in Upper St. Clair to make it an even better place to live?
What is on your Upper St. Clair wish list? What would you improve in 2013? What would you change?
Tell us in the comment section below or blog about what you might change.
Oren Spiegler
6:43 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
My impossible dream is to improve the oppressive tax environment. This, however, would require a magic wand as much of our exorbitant spending path is set in stone. If a referendum had been on the ballot, would the community have approved a $27.5 million recreation center palace which forces all residents to subsidize their neighbors' dues? Would a $60 million school renovation project have been put into place? Would the community have supported compensating teachers at the top of the pay scale over $100,000 per annum plus spectacular benefits (an amount which thanks to members of the teachers union has since been scaled back)?
This could be a great community in virtually every respect if the ability for the middle class family to live here within its means had not been yanked away by elected officials that are as reckless and irresponsible as any.
Thomas Stuvants
6:58 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
On-street leaf pickup like some of our competing neighboring communities provide, so we do not have to spend time and money bagging leaves or paying someone else to do it! Mulch the leaves and sell it back to the public to help cover the costs. Selling the mulch, along with cost savings from not purchasing leaf bags or fees paid to landscapers, may be a welcome service for our tax-paying residents! Let's put it to a referendum.
Deb
7:42 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
Fair assessments for EVERYONE based on recent home sales instead of some people being assessed beneath the property value and new homes taking years to get an assessment that is not based on an empty lot value.
Also, the curbside leaf-sucking truck like Mt Lebo has like Thomas said.
Oren Spiegler
7:53 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
Amen, Deb. This, too, though, is the impossible dream. The county cannot afford to pay the amount that would need to be expended to hire qualified assessors who perform more than three to five minute "drive-by" visits to pick a property value out of the air. To secure accurate assessments would require a professional appraiser that enters the home. Homes which look the same on the outside can be radically different in value. My home has the original kitchen from the time it was built in 1975. Should my property be valued the same as that of neighbors that have spent $50,000 or more to install state of the art kitchens and who have done additional extensive work to improve their properties? On the other hand, is it fair to penalize those that improve their properties with higher assessments and higher taxes? Your call for fair assessments serves to make the perfect argument for scrapping a system which has not and shall never be fair or perceived as fair. Need we examine any further evidence of the need for a more equitable, less agonizing and less expensive revenue-raising mechanism in recalling misstep after misstep associated with the disastrous reassessment in which we continue to be embroiled?
Ron Rodriguez
9:09 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
I agree with the other comments but I need to add sidewalks to the list. There are too many areas where it is dangerous to run or walk because of it. It is safer to drive somewhere that has continuous sidewalks than run or walk along the road.
M L spazok
9:53 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
a new, improved, ATTRACTIVE re 19 at fort couch. Ilike st clair. sidewalks - move to LEBO and pay yet higher taxes in a congested area. assessments - dont vote for democrats. its in your hands thru your vote.
happy new year !!
M L spazok
9:55 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
sorry - forgot - attach a mulching blade to your lawnmover. the streets are very slippery with all that leaf debris in LEBO as they do the leaf collection occasionally
Deb
10:56 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
M L, yes republicans do such a great job on those issues, lol.
On assessments, you just have to go to the assessment website and compare selling price to assessments, and look at some that build a million-dollar home and pay tax on land value for 5 years. This isn't rocket science folks. I know people aren't going to say, "hey, I'm under assessed" but there has to be some way to fix the most obvious errors. Like the township going to the county as they have done in some cases. It may be worth paying someone in the township to just follow up on sales price vs. assessed value. The lost revenues on that have to be worth it, and the fairness issue is also important. I certainly don't mind paying my fair share, but "fair" is the key.
Bryan
11:09 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
You clearly don't understand how the system works. Assessments don't change when a house is sold.
I would guess to say that even with the new assessment, MAYBE 1% of the houses in the township are actually assessed at true market value. If the entire system was fixed then that would mean a correction of the entire township of values plus a correction of the millage rate as the township would reap a HUGE windfall.
As for the taxes on a new construction, that is Allegheny county Act 202, it is NOT 5 years it is a 2 year abatement on taxes, the purpose is obviously to entice new construction within the county. Obviously the county can't take account the micro environments of each township.
The system is broken, the problem is, it is VERY difficult to fix.
Regardless, this is NOT something our township can do. Of all of the responses to this post, Thomas is the only one with a reasonable idea.
As far as those asking for sidewalks, there is a township master plan to add sidewalks. It is logistical impossibility to add sidewalks throughout the township. If the original plan and construction didn't account for a sidewalk, it could be almost impossible to add sidewalks in many places.
Sue
11:13 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013
I would like to see the rec ccenter open earlier on Sunday's and holidays. If they want shorter hours on those days open earlier and close earlier. It is a absolute mob scene there on Sundays, Christmas eve and New Years eve.
Roger
5:08 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
Quoting, " ... It is a absolute mob scene there on Sundays, "
This is a sad commentary. Tell us this isn't true, please.
Dawnmarie
5:34 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I would like to see the Rec Center stay open on Saturday nights. I think that having the gyms and pools open for kids to play is an important aspect of a "recreation" center. Saturday night may be one of the only nights that families can get to the rec center together.
M L spazok
4:43 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
Gee dont these employees deserve a day or a least a little personal time.
perhaps substitute this indorr xercise with a trail walk
food for thought
AParent
5:31 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
-Move those mailboxes back that hang over the road. This would save a lot of side mirror repairs and you don’t have to veer into the oncoming lane just to avoid hitting someone’s mailbox. The Township code states that the mail receptacles must hang behind the curb.
-Move or maintain bushes so you can actually see if a car is coming when you cross or turn at an intersection; or put smart traffic lights at these intersections. The intersection of Seeger and McMillan Roads has over a dozen accidents each year. G-d forbid we should wait until someone dies before something is done!
Glenn Robinson
7:51 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
Fiscal responsibility and social acceptance. Is that too much to ask for?
bob balmer
8:04 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
I agree with Glen. That is not to much to ask for.
Duke
9:09 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
Have the Community and Recreation Center fees reduced downward so that membership is affordable for all Upper St. Clair residents! After all, they are paying for this Taj Mahal!
Rebecca
10:00 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
I absolutely agree!
Chad Twedt
9:32 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013
If sidewalks everywhere are an impossible dream, having more bus stops shouldn't be, and having lots of bus stops should be considered an inevitability for a township that thought nothing of sidewalks when it was being built. Our bus stop isn't visible from our home and is actually quite a walk - the stops before and after our house are nearly a quarter mile apart, and we're right in the middle. The school transportation department rejected our request to add a stop even though 3 kids (2 of our own and 1 neighbor) would benefit AND the bus already arrives no later than 2 minutes early every morning (almost always 3-4 minutes early).
Bryan
8:42 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Heck, let's just make the bus stop at everyone's house! I went to USC, my bus stop was nowhere near my house, I stood on a patch of grass to avoid cars. I frequently walked home from elementary and middle school without any sidewalks, so did a lot of other kids. So DO a lot of kids today.
When is the last time you heard a child being struck by a vehicle in USC?
USC for me
5:13 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
USC love it or leave it! It always amuses me that some people move here and then want to change everything and others have been here for years and are always so critical of it.
Oren Spiegler
5:37 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
I would note that some of us moved here before the massive spending spree began, coming here at a time that there was reason to believe that this truly was a community in which the people and the government believed in fiscal prudence and minimizing the tax burden. I came to the community in 2002, before the Recreation Center palace had been crammed down our throats and before the school board was placed in the control of those who have demonstrated not the slightest concern for the taxpayers notwithstanding their lip service to the ideal of fiscal prudence. Had I known then what I do now, I would likely have selected a different place to live.
M L spazok
8:28 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
I am with "USC for me". drive to other areas such as the Mon Valley - very sad.
One of our neighboring communities allows shacks and doublewides next to gorgeous homes - ugh!! if USC isnt for you, time to move. Then you can sit and wait for the snow plows or no snow plows,, no policeor state police due to no low tax revenue.
USC is the best
Lynne
8:55 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Would you rather those individuals who live in "shacks and doublewides" be homeless??? I happen to live next to one of each of those (shack and doublewide) in a "neighboring communtiy". My home you would probably describe as "gorgeous" . I wouldn't trade these two neighbors for anything. They are kind, friendly, and would give me the shirt off their back. Unlike most in your Kingdom of Upper Snooty Clair, always thinking you're better than everyone else.
Deb
9:19 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Lynn, just as there are kind and friendly people living in less affluent communities, so are there kind and friendly people in USC. Gross generalizations are wrong in either case. Just sayin'...
M L spazok
9:55 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
lynne
my reply was to a USC whiner resident. just saying - USC ordinances are set in place for a reason. there are wonderful residents in USC with friends in adjoining communities and vice versa. remember, lynne - its a lifestyle choice. we are in allegh county where location,location location dictates sale of house and value. we pay big time for location and convenience. IT IS A LIFESTYLE and SCHOOL DISTRICT CHOICE. Thanks for your consideration
Joan Kubancek
10:21 am on Monday, January 14, 2013
Women on the police force.
Oren Spiegler
6:29 pm on Monday, January 14, 2013
An excellent suggestion, Ms Kubancek. I have found our officers to be terrific, but I have often wondered if the day will ever come that someone other than a white male is granted entry to the force. Why not?
Concerned USC Resident
7:17 am on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
I would have to say that moving the mailboxes back from the road would be a great improvement. Look at how many times they are damaged if not destroyed. Especially when the snowplows come through trying to clear the roads. Granted the guys who drive the snow trucks do everything possible to miss those mailboxes, sometimes it is almost impossible to. Not only is it the guys who hit them with the trucks, but sometimes you have the slush and sludge that hit them and knock them over.
My other suggestion is that our police force really needs to have a range of different natonalities and sexes on the force. After all we say that everyone is equal and should be treated the same. How does that happen when it appears there is only a one way road it seems like in who they hire. Just a suggestion!!!!
paul
10:07 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013
Left turn signal and left lane from mcmillan to McLaughlin run road
It is difficult in rush hours
And
Left turning separate lane from McLaughlin run to morrow road