Pittsburgh Steelers great and PSU alumni Franco Harris is again coming to the defense of the late Penn State football coaching legend Joe Paterno, whose career ended with the Penn State sex scandal.
In an open letter, Harris blasts NCAA President Mark Emmert for making what he calls a misleading, damaging and untrue statement by including Joe Paterno on his list of coaches that were fired for “misdeeds.”
"Mr. Emmert should know that before you bunch everyone together and pass judgment, you must first get all the facts and the truth about each one. Obviously, he didn’t," Harris wrote.
Harris refers to statements Emmert made in an Associated Press article.
In the article, Emmert said, “You’re seeing boards of directors, of trustees, and presidents and athletic directors saying ‘You know you’ve done a great job here. We love you. We pay you really well. You get all this adoration. You’ve got to live by the rules.’” Emmert goes on to say, “And that’s a good thing.”
Coaches such as Joe Paterno (Penn State), Jim Tressel (Ohio State), Bobby Petrino (Arkansas), Butch Davis (North Carolina) and Bruce Pearl (Tennessee) in the past had been considered "untouchable," Emmert said.
Harris wrote that he is "very disappointed" in Emmert and the NCAA for taking such a position against Paterno "in essence becoming the judge, jury and executioner."
"But this should come as no surprise to those who know the NCAA," Harris wrote.
Paterno had served as Penn State’s head coach from1966 until he was fired amidst the Jerry Sandusky sex scandal. Although Paterno was never charged with any crimes in the scandal, the Penn State Board of Trustees decided he did not do enough to prevent the abuses alleged to have occurred under his watch.
Many came to Paterno’s defense, but few were as vocal than Hall of Fame running back Harris, who made headlines for telling numerous media outlets that he planned to travel to State College to ask school officials to reinstate Paterno as head coach.
That led to a "mutual postponement" of Harris' business relationship with The Meadows Racetrack & Casino in North Strabane, according to a spokesman for the racetrack. Harris joined The Meadows Racetrack & Casino in September to help with philanthropy and advertising efforts.
Read the full statement below:
NCAA President Mark Emmert has made a misleading, damaging and untrue statement (AP) when he included Joe Paterno on his list of coaches that were fired for “misdeeds.” Mr. Emmert should know that before you bunch everyone together and pass judgment, you must first get all the facts and the truth about each one. Obviously, he didn’t.
I am very disappointed in Mark Emmert and the NCAA for taking this position on Joe Paterno, in essence becoming the judge, jury and executioner. But this should come as no surprise to those who know the NCAA. In the article, Emmert made the following statements:
“You’re seeing boards of directors, of trustees, and presidents and athletic directors saying ‘You know you’ve done a great job here. We love you. We pay you really well. You get all this adoration. You’ve got to live by the rules.’” Emmert went on to say, “And that’s a good thing.”
Well Mark, in reference to your statement, Joe did live by the rules of the University, of the NCAA, and of the law. However, you omitted the fact that Joe Paterno and the Penn State Football Program did not commit even one major NCAA violation in 61 years. Mr. Emmert, we are talking about a man who had a great family life, who gave so much more than he received, and whose motto of his football program was Success WithHonor. And yes, he lived by his credo as well as your rules. In fact, in 2011 Joe Paterno’s Success With Honor initiative earned Penn State the ranking of the #1 academic football program in the country.
In the article, Mark Emmert said the five coaches who were fired (Paterno, Tressel, Petrino, Davis, and Pearl) had been considered “untouchable” in the past. Well, I would like to correct Mr. Emmert. The only “untouchable” in the history of college sports is the NCAA. You and your group are not accountable to anyone, as your actions have shown through the years. The only other “untouchable” within the College and University ranks is the Board of Trustees. Once again, they are not held accountable to anyone, despite their misdeeds.
If a person or organization is found guilty of a misdeed after the investigation, I wholeheartedly support the action of them being held accountable. In my opinion, there should be no exceptions, including the NCAA and the Board of Trustees.
Franco Harris
PSU '72
What do you think? Is Harris right in defending the late Paterno? Should he continue to speak out or remain silent on the matter?
M L spazok
7:03 pm on Saturday, April 28, 2012
Franco Harris is a respectful gentleman. Some sports players, coaches, execs exhude hatred and run at the mouth. all stems from a small mind, low self esteem, small vocabulary and absolutely no repsect for fellow human beings. Reality tv, the internet and violence in movies has trickeled over into society. thats the self-entitlement generation!
Tom Fitzsimmons
9:36 am on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Franco is an honorable and humble man. He believes that Joe Patetno was treated hastily and disrespectfully by the Penn State board of trustees, the university and the NCAA. I completely agree with Franco
Robert Campbell
6:22 pm on Monday, April 30, 2012
I also believe JoePa was treated hastily and without merit. The BoT showed no courage in the way this played out. Joe could not have stopped something that took place a day before he was told. I also think if he had intervened later on all of you PSU haters would have said he was using his power to change the outcome. So he was wrong no matter what he did in your eyes. Yes, I played for JoePa.
Josh kerry
7:49 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
Franco is a delusional man so caught up in the fantasy and God - like status he places Paterno, that nothing could open his eyes to the fact that lives were destroyed because a good man failed to act. As much as these JoePa followers want to point to his 'satisfying' the law by telling his boss, those of us who have been damaged by such abuse see it in the same light as someone seeing a rape outside their front door, setting their deadbolt, calling authorities and hiding in their closet. Doesn't matter that the rapist ran away and continued to rape another 10 yrs. Shame on all of you for placing your love of a football coach over the lives of us that have been destroyed.
M L spazok
8:06 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
I attended the Univ of Pitt in the 70's. One day in the Cathedral of Learning i exited the ladies room into the hall to find a man blatantly exposing himself. i went directly to Campus Security to report as did others. then i went to class. i am not in crime and law enforcement so I depended on security to investigate. I followed the chain of command. it can be very dangerous to make liable statments / accusations without proof - in my case would have been a photo. In 2012, no one is saying there isnt wrongdoing. We are saying that each citizen has the right to free speech - his or her opinion.
M L spazok
8:48 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
i am a professor and have been a positive example for hundreds of students over 35 years. Josh, are you an expert in crime and law inforcement, an attorney, lawyer,? it is quite impolite to demean anyones character esp.in PSU if one does not have first hand evidence, facts etc. Until then, innocent until proven guilty.
Josh kerry
9:16 pm on Sunday, April 29, 2012
None of the above, I'm now a grown man and (if needed), would put my own life in peril if I knew of someone sexually abusing another and had the power to stop it. These acts are not over in the moment, they may not leave visiable scars or carry the sensationalism of say, gun violence. But they last for a lifetime. As a honorable man, it is my job to defend the weakest of all. That is success with honor. I respect your position, but having lived through a similar secenerio, waiting for the facts ( as I assume you are relating to JP's position), gives no comfort to the 3 (or more) young boys (after 2002) who will never truly heal. I do not mean to anger you, and as I said earlier, respect your opinion. Just something I guess we will have to agree to disagree.